I'm assuming you're referring to the 1991 film "Ladyboy: The Adventures of Lisa" or more commonly known as "Ladyboy".
"Ladyboy" is a comedy film starring Chris O'Donnell and Robin Wright. The movie follows the story of Chris (O'Donnell), an American tourist who poses as a woman to participate in a beauty pageant in Thailand.
Overall, "Ladyboy" is a fun and harmless film that's worth watching for its comedic value and interesting cultural insights.
"Ladyboy" is a light-hearted and entertaining film with a unique premise. The chemistry between Chris O'Donnell and Robin Wright is undeniable, and their comedic timing is spot on. The film's portrayal of Thai culture and the beauty pageant is colorful and engaging. However, some critics argue that the movie relies on stereotypes and cultural misunderstandings for comedic effect.
Rating: 3.5/5 stars
Here's a brief review:
Have you seen "Ladyboy" before, or would you like more information about the film?
Lisa: Ladyboy
I'm assuming you're referring to the 1991 film "Ladyboy: The Adventures of Lisa" or more commonly known as "Ladyboy".
"Ladyboy" is a comedy film starring Chris O'Donnell and Robin Wright. The movie follows the story of Chris (O'Donnell), an American tourist who poses as a woman to participate in a beauty pageant in Thailand. ladyboy lisa
Overall, "Ladyboy" is a fun and harmless film that's worth watching for its comedic value and interesting cultural insights. I'm assuming you're referring to the 1991 film
"Ladyboy" is a light-hearted and entertaining film with a unique premise. The chemistry between Chris O'Donnell and Robin Wright is undeniable, and their comedic timing is spot on. The film's portrayal of Thai culture and the beauty pageant is colorful and engaging. However, some critics argue that the movie relies on stereotypes and cultural misunderstandings for comedic effect. Overall, "Ladyboy" is a fun and harmless film
Rating: 3.5/5 stars
Here's a brief review:
Have you seen "Ladyboy" before, or would you like more information about the film?
This could have to do with the pathing policy as well. The default SATP rule is likely going to be using MRU (most recently used) pathing policy for new devices, which only uses one of the available paths. Ideally they would be using Round Robin, which has an IOPs limit setting. That setting is 1000 by default I believe (would need to double check that), meaning that it sends 1000 IOPs down path 1, then 1000 IOPs down path 2, etc. That’s why the pathing policy could be at play.
To your question, having one path down is causing this logging to occur. Yes, it’s total possible if that path that went down is using MRU or RR with an IOPs limit of 1000, that when it goes down you’ll hit that 16 second HB timeout before nmp switches over to the next path.